[hpsdr] More on Horton LO

[Eric Ellison]

Bob

I sure can do that with Dale's help. I think it appropriate for high priced
long lead time items to do this, which does give us some metrics on how many
are really interested in the BEST!

What ever happened to the programmable tcxo we were discussing a while back.
No lead time since it was 'programable and 'trimable' at manufacture. I
think it was 'siliconix' or something like that!

Someone suggest how we should express the 'interest' area on the TAPR-HPSDR
area on Dale's website?

Eric


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert McGwier [mailto:rwmcgwier at comcast.net] 
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 10:50 PM
To: Eric Ellison
Cc: mnaruta at comcast.net; 'Hans Summers'; hpsdr at hpsdr.org
Subject: Re: [hpsdr] More on Horton LO

Just be sure and leave it at interest.  We don't have a suitable QSD 
design yet, though I am going to be evaluating one by Microchip on 
Wednesday and I think we might want to try the Bartram approach to the 
LO first (much cheaper,  easy to find parts).

Bob
N4HY


Eric Ellison wrote:
> Mike
>
> I don't either, even at $150 per. I want to catch one of them leapseconds,
> before I die! Perhaps we should add this somewhat high priced, long lead
> time OSC to the "Expression of interest" area on Dale's website?
>
> Thanks
> Eric - AA4SW
>
> Sorry... QRT till after Fredrichshafen!
>
>   


-- 
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
Laziness is the number one inspiration for ingenuity.  Guilty as charged!



 1150774076.0