[hpsdr] My $0.02 worth on board size...
lyle johnson
kk7p at wavecable.com
Wed May 24 21:05:01 PDT 2006
Hello Mike!
> ... The worst case rework on any board that has
> already been laid out will be moving the I/O
> connectors from the edge opposite the DIN connector
> to the adjacent edge. Since I'm not designing the
> boards, I'd like to hear some discussion from the
> designers on how greatly it would affect them.
> While it might be a little painful right now, wouldn't
> it be worth it for the added future flexibility?
With the small size of the board in all of these
discussions, 100mm x 100mm, we have severe constraints for
routing. Even if we allow the larger 100mm x 185mm size,
the 100mm x 100mm is still on the list.
Please look at the Janus preliminary layout (on the wiki)
for the following dicussion.
You see that with the present layout, the signal flow is
logical between the ATLAS bus and the board IO. This
arrangement also provides maximum isolation (distance)
between ATLAS and the very sensitive analog IO on Janus.
If the connectors were put on the left vertical edge
(viewing the PCB layout as positioned on the wiki page),
we have some significant crowding, particularly on the
lower left of the board area. There is no room for the
analog I/O buffers, although we could re-arrange things so
that the PWM output was lowest on the board and the AKM
ADC input buffer cirsuitry on the top edge to make room
for them.
I suspect we'd have to start putting parts on both sides
of the board. Not really a problem, just a consideration.
I think that, overall, we are forced to less efficient
use of the limited board real estate with this
configuration versus the present configuration.
In the case of Janus, even if we went to the large size,
we'd still be very cramped in the lower left of the board.
If we used the larger 100mm x 185mm board size and put the
IO on the farther edge, we'd relieve the crowding -- but
we'd then require that all boards be 100mm x 185mm. This
is almost double the cost of the 100mm x 100mm board. The
board cost isn't a big driver in all of this, but it has
impact if you are buying five or six cards for your ATLAS
bus.
Note also that with the present configuration, one can
still make larger boards, such as 100mm x 185mm. The
limitation is where the IO connectors reside. With the
present configuration, a longer board would have more room
for IO connectors instead of being restricted to the 100mm
left edge.
Thus, efficient use of PCB real estate and signal flow
suggest to me that the current arrangement is better
alternative. I understand that from case and mechanical
convenience perspectives, it may not be optimal.
And, certainly, if we are going to change, it is better to
do so now rather than later :-)
73,
Lyle KK7P
1148529901.0
More information about the Hpsdr
mailing list