[hpsdr] My Apologies to Scotty! Was (Re: Thermal)

Rob Frohne rob.frohne at wallawalla.edu
Thu Jan 15 14:27:03 PST 2009


Philip, Scotty, et. al.

Philip, you are right, and I wish you weren't, because I enjoyed 
learning from the discussions.  Perhaps the problem is that with so many 
folk reading the mail it is hard to do some of the discussion that needs 
to take place without making someone feel like they are being criticized 
in public.  I wish we could figure out a way around this.

Thinking about it made me realize that a comment I made to Scotty and 
the list at the beginning of this thermal discussion probably falls in 
that category.  Scotty, I'm sorry if you felt criticized.  I didn't mean 
to start an avalanche of comments that were critical of your analysis, 
or criticize you in public especially.  I'm sorry!

Please keep the good discussions going on this list, and I'd really 
appreciate it if some of the rest of you would CC the list with your 
private design discussions if possible!

Thanks,

Rob

Philip Covington wrote:
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:17 PM, FRANCIS CARCIA <carcia at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>   
>> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>> I come from the mil world so.........I'm crazy
>> We have nobody to blame but ourselves. Not TAPR. We all had a chance to review the design. Yes the part is within its ratings. It is your choice if you want to make a change.
>> I really value TAPR support and have no issue with their efforts. This RX rocks I can fix the small issue. The future maybe it would be a good idea to check out the design package. I would have a problem if someone blew me off. I suggested ESD terminations early on which were added. We all know the value of them in the cold dry winter up here in the N.E.
>> I was on 160 AM last night and hit A/D saturation on voice peaks. I have a nice SMA transfer relay to terminate the input to 50 ohms in TX. No big deal.
>> I didn't mean to start anything with my comments but HPSDR means HP and in my 30 years of building receivers I've made my share of mistakes. Frank WA1GFZ
>>     
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> Unfortunately most design discussion appears to be taking place
> privately via emails and is not discussed much in the open on the
> HPSDR list. There was much more open discussion in the early days of
> the list.
>
> 73 Phil N8VB
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at hpsdr.org
> Subscription help: http://lists.hpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-hpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://hpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.hpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-hpsdr.org/
>   

-- 
Rob Frohne, Ph.D., P.E.
E.F. Cross School of Engineering
Walla Walla University
100 SW 4th Street
College Place, WA 99324
(509) 527-2075			 http://people.wallawalla.edu/~Rob.Frohne/


 1232058423.0


More information about the Hpsdr mailing list