[hpsdr] Penelope changes for Excalibur?

[Riho, ES7AAZ]

Thanks a lot,

It was just a pure interest how does HPSDR behave with Excalibur 10MHz 
only regarding this.
I personally am happy with Penelope 10MHz source only.  I don't have an 
Excalibur in my setup.


73's,
Riho, ES7AAZ.


Bruce Beford wrote:
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> Riho, ES7AAZ asked:
>
>   
>> Is there any improvement of 10MHz harmonics on freq. 20, 30, 40, 50MHz  
>> when  Penelope 10MHz is disabled ?
>>     
>
> I cannot say at this time, Riho. I disabled the 10 MHz clock on Penelope
> before I had made any measurements on the harmonic frequencies. I hope to
> make some measurements with the Penelope 10 MHz clock both enabled and
> disabled sometime soon. I believe you will always have some nominal 10 MHz
> energy coupled into the receiver regardless of which clock you choose. To
> me, the issue is reducing the number of spurs generated by having fewer
> clocks running. Since each 10 MHz clock will be slightly different in actual
> frequency, each will produce their own distinct spurs. The idea is to
> minimize the numbers of these by only running the oscillators needed.
>
> 73,
> Bruce, N1RX
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> Subscription help: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
>
>   


 1262544490.0