[hpsdr] gif comparisons of old and new HPSDR PowerSDR waterfalls on 3456 MHz weak signal
w3sz
73w3sz at gmail.com
Sun May 2 12:43:37 PDT 2010
Hello, All,
I was able to get out to my microwave site and make some comparison gifs
of the old and new PowerSDR waterfalls [both fully zoomed and at maximal
display bandwidth], and to compare them to Linrad.
I posted them so folks can see the difference between 'old' and 'new'.
There is quite a difference between the old and new PowerSDR waterfalls
for this weak signal which was 5-8 dB out of the noise on peaks.
The weak signal of interest, from a weak signal source on 3456.041, is
at approximately 3456.041 on the PowerSDR displays, and at 41000 on the
Linrad display [the center of the Linrad display is at 50000, so it is
just below the center of the Linrad display.
original PowerSDR fully zoomed:
http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz/originalPowerSDR3456weaksignal.GIF
modified PowerSDR fully zoomed:
http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz/newPowerSDR3456weaksignalnar.GIF
original PowerSDR maximal bandscope width:
http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz/originalPowerSDR3456weaksignalwide.GIF
modified PowerSDR maximal bandscope width:
http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz/newPowerSDR3456weaksignalwide.GIF
Linrad bandscope:
http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz/linrad3456weaksignal.gif
The signal levels in dB are not consistent across PowerSDR instances
because I was also trying to recalibrate the PowerSDR settings for
signal level today using an 8640B. Those differences do not affect the
PanAdapter or the Waterfall displays.
73,
Roger Rehr W3SZ
More information about the Hpsdr
mailing list