[hpsdr] SDR architectures

[Jeremy McDermond]

Steve Hicks from Flex claims they are using the VITA 49 standard for transporting signals on their 6000 series.

http://www.rtcmagazine.com/articles/view/100460

On May 25, 2014, at 6:08 AM, Steven B. Dick <sbdick at optonline.net> wrote:

> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> 
> With regard to an agreed upon protocol, there are some ideas presented in an
> emerging VITA standard called the VITA Radio Transport Protocol for SDR
> Architectures.  See:
> http://www.pentek.com/tutorials/17_2/VITA.cfm
> 
> Regards,
> "Digital Steve", K1RF
> 
> From: Doug Adams <douglas.adams at me.com>
> To: hpsdr at lists.openhpsdr.org
> Subject: [hpsdr]  SDR Architectures
> Message-ID: <F036E2C0-589B-40FD-A473-A08A73DBB5D8 at me.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> 
> To push the thought again, suppose we developed an agreed upon protocol
> (like the Open HPSDR protocol) not only for servers but also for server
> components. If, for example, I wanted to try using the AM Demodulator from
> cuSDR64 in my Mac-based SDR project, today this would be very tedious if not
> impossible. If we could define a protocol for accessing the individual
> components of an SDR server (and if cuSDR64's AM Demodulator ran on a
> conforming server) it would be doable. All of the best algorithms/software
> would now be available to developers regardless of the platform they chose
> for their own development efforts.With regard to 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> Subscription help: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
> 



--
Jeremy McDermond (NH6Z)
Xenotropic Systems
mcdermj at xenotropic.com




 1401317153.0