[hpsdr] New protocol , new apache hardware?

[Scott Traurig]

Joe,

Perhaps it should also be said that:

Thetis requires the new firmware
PowerSDR requires the old firmware.

That said, functionally there are not very many differences between the two
programs, the UI's are nearly identical.

Correct?

73,

Scott/w-u-2-o



On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Joe Martin <k5so at k5so.com> wrote:

> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> Hi George,
>
> No, not designed specifically for the Thetis program, that I’m aware of.
>
> Instead, the Thetis program is designed to run on all of the existing
> OpenHPSDR and Apache Labs platforms except for Atlas-based systems.
>
> 73, Joe K5SO
>
> > On Nov 14, 2016, at 11:29 AM, georg Prinz <getpri at t-online.de> wrote:
> >
> > ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> >
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > is there a new hardware under development for Thetis?
> >
> > 73, Georg,
> > dl2kp
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 14.11.2016 um 18:32 schrieb Joe Martin:
> >> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> >>
> >> An additional, personal comment:  The OpenHPSDR project is by design a
> dynamic effort to explore the highest performance available at reasonable
> cost; that’s why most everyone in the project joined in the first place.
> It seems rather self-defeating toward that goal to force ourselves to be
> locked to older schemes forever going forward.  I view the overall project
> as an evolving effort and given the limited resources available to us it
> would seem to me that at some point we should realistically and
> periodically review our efforts to ensure we are doing as well as we can in
> the effort.  If this is true then it would seem to me that at some point,
> not today perhaps I think but sometime in the not too distant future, I for
> one will lose interest in supporting lower performance platforms.  I do not
> speak for anyone else of course but if every developer begins to feel that
> way I can’t see why or how others should object to anyone focusing more on
> higher performance platforms and less on lower performance platforms.
> Eventually it seems natural to me that support for the Atlas based systems
> should become less  and less important to the overall project.
> >>
> >> This is only my personal opinion, of course, and does not in any way
> reflect any “official” position of the OpenHPSDR project but on the other
> hand my opinion does naturally guide me as to what I wish to personally
> contribute to the OpenHPSDR project.
> >>
> >> 73, Joe K5SO
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> HPSDR Discussion List
> >> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> >> Subscription help: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/
> listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> >> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> >> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > HPSDR Discussion List
> > To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> > Subscription help: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/
> listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> > HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> > Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> Subscription help: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/
> listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20161114/5b234cac/attachment.htm>