<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
        {font-family:Wingdings;
        panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Wingdings;
        panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>

<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>

<div class=Section1>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Now I finally understand the “Bill Tracey may have been
here” comments salted into the PowerSDR codebase….<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;
color:#1F497D'>J</span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Dan<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>

<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>

<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
hpsdr-bounces@lists.openhpsdr.org [mailto:hpsdr-bounces@lists.openhpsdr.org] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Frank Brickle<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, June 08, 2009 4:36 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> David McQuate<br>
<b>Cc:</b> hpsdr@openhpsdr.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [hpsdr] spectrum increased frequency resolution?<o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Stuff the samples into a longer
FFT and pad with zeros.<br>
<br>
Remember, though, that what you gain in frequency resolution you lose in time
resolution. That's Heisenberg Uncertainty.<br>
<br>
You also have to be a little careful about how you window the data. Google is
your friend.<br>
<br>
73<br>
Frank<br>
AB2KT<o:p></o:p></p>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal>On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:57 PM, David McQuate <<a
href="mailto:mcquate@sonic.net">mcquate@sonic.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=MsoNormal>***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion
List *****<br>
<br>
If I have a block of samples (say N = 4096, fs = 122.88 Msps),<br>
a straightforward FFT produces data with frequency resolution of 30kHz.<br>
<br>
Is there a technique that will allow me to obtain information on a finer<br>
frequency grid (say 1kHz or 300Hz or ...)--other than "simply"
acquiring<br>
additional data, extending the length of the time record?<br>
<br>
I've looked at Chirp-Z transforms and polyphase decimation, but neither<br>
seems to produce higher frequency resolution.  I've also looked into
DttSP,<br>
but not found a solution there.<br>
<br>
Am I hoping for the impossible?<br>
<br>
Suggestions please.<br>
<br>
73,<br>
Dave<br>
wa8ywq<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
HPSDR Discussion List<br>
To post msg: <a href="mailto:hpsdr@openhpsdr.org" target="_blank">hpsdr@openhpsdr.org</a><br>
Subscription help: <a
href="http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org"
target="_blank">http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org</a><br>
HPSDR web page: <a href="http://openhpsdr.org" target="_blank">http://openhpsdr.org</a><br>
Archives: <a href="http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/"
target="_blank">http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/</a><o:p></o:p></p>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><br>
<br clear=all>
<br>
-- <br>
...although production beyond capacity is a contradiction in terms, it is
observed every day in academia. -- Frank Knight<o:p></o:p></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>