<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Brian,<br>
        I am not disagreeing with what you wrote.  I simply provided out
    a practical method for determining the external sample level and
    internal attenuation needed to overcome the internal crosstalk,
    which will be different for each band and power level used.  <br>
    <br>
    Bill KC9XG<br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/26/2014 11:07 AM, Brian Lloyd
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAE3hgTe8CZggaarFqG1X0ygT1o=T3WOtoO4h8x3K-z51R3qxHw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:49 AM,
            Bill Diaz <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:william.diaz@comcast.net" target="_blank">william.diaz@comcast.net</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div class="">
                <div class="h5">***** High Performance Software Defined
                  Radio Discussion List *****<br>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Brian,<br>
                    Based on extensive testing by Mukesh, KE3VG, with a
                ClearRF sampler, good results were achieved on 20 and 40
                meters when the external sample level was 6db higher
                than the observed internal crosstalk level on that
                band.  This may not be practical on the higher bands due
                to the higher crosstalk at higher frequencies.<br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div
              style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.727272033691406px">Well,
              I stand by what I wrote. Every radio/amp/coupler/frequency
              combination will be different. Each person is going to
              have to adjust their setup to match their equipment. I
              wanted to lay out the PROCESS by which maximum performance
              can be achieved. I didn't address the issues of filter
              selection or other parameters. Someone who knows those
              effects better than I should do that. Regardless, what I
              posted is correct and useful.</div>
            <div
              style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.727272033691406px"><br>
            </div>
            <div><span
                style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.727272033691406px">As
                a final point, no one seems to be addressing the issue
                of reducing stray coupling inside the ANAN 100. That
                alone would provide the biggest improvement and make all
                the other settings less critical.</span></div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
          -- <br>
          <div dir="ltr">Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN/J79BPL      <img
              moz-do-not-send="true"
              src="http://www.catb.org/hacker-emblem/glider.png"><br>
            706 Flightline Drive<br>
            Spring Branch, TX 78070<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:brian@lloyd.com"
              target="_blank">brian@lloyd.com</a><br>
            <span><span id="gc-number-47" class="" title="Call with
                Google Voice">+1.916.877.5067</span></span></div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>