<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
Bert,<br>
<br>
I'd go for more cores (preference). More cores = more threads
and that can be helpful while running multiple apps.<br>
<br>
I've got an 8 core AMD 9590 which rarely goes over 20%
utilization with two bands, HRD, digital master, and VAC running-
while watching a movie... .<br>
<br>
Either of those chips would perform just fine.<br>
<br>
Michael KD8TUT<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/31/2015 2:36 PM, H.A.Meijer
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:56350A1F.8090600@home.nl" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
Hi to you all,
<br>
<br>
I'm looking for components to build a new sdr pc for use with my
<br>
HPSDR hardware.
<br>
<br>
Now I'm asking myself, what would make a better " thick pipe SDR"
CPU.
<br>
<br>
Higher CPU clock freq. and less cores,
<br>
for example a, Intel Core i7-6700K, 4x 4.00GHz. ?
<br>
or
<br>
more cores and lower CPU clock freq.?
<br>
for example a : Intel Core i7-5820K, 6x 3.30GHz.
<br>
<br>
Any thoughts on this......
<br>
<br>
<br>
73's Bert PA2XHF.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
HPSDR Discussion List
To post msg: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:hpsdr@openhpsdr.org">hpsdr@openhpsdr.org</a>
Subscription help: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org">http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org</a>
HPSDR web page: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://openhpsdr.org">http://openhpsdr.org</a>
Archives: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/">http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>