<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi Bert,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the feedback. On SNB, yes, the low-end loss is by
design. Including the low-end response requires more compute cycles
and so I've left that out for now. I plan to reconsider that some
day.<br>
<br>
73,<br>
Warren NR0V<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/23/2016 1:24 PM, H.A.Meijer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:cfac8b37-bbf3-1ec0-1f72-f8b2e0b6ddf6@home.nl"
type="cite">
<div class="moz-forward-container">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi,<br>
<br>
Just a little heads-up to the HPSDR developers, the latest
openHPSDR v.3.3.7. is working very well and stable.<br>
<br>
The audio distortions, when changing filter band width and
pan-adapter zooming, are now gone.<br>
<br>
(due to the 1 ms timer resolution done by the open HPSDR program
it self.) Thanks!.<br>
<br>
The NR2 is best I've ever seen (heard) on any ham-grade
transceiver.<br>
<br>
When using SNB I lose all the audio low-end to almost 300Hz,
that's by design?<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
73,<br>
Bert PA2XHF / PE1MTS. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>