[hpsdr] Fwd: Horton Local Oscillator

[Philip Covington]

On 6/20/06, Alex <harvilchuck at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sorry, catching up with the e-mail ...
>
> I thought design was for a fixed clock on MERCURY.
> I agree with the external LO on HORTON and CASMIR for two reasons:
>
> (a) anyone can use whatever design they would like for the LO (modular building blocks)
> (c) an off-board LO can make it easier to put adequate rf shielding in place
>
> Alex, N3NP
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Philip Covington <p.covington at gmail.com>
> To: Alex <harvilchuck at yahoo.com>
> Cc: High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List <hpsdr at hpsdr.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:50:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [hpsdr] Fwd: Horton Local Oscillator
>
> On 6/17/06, Alex <harvilchuck at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Are we saying to have separate VCOs on each HORTON, MERCURY, and CASMIR?
>
> Nope, I don't think anyone is saying that yet...  and why would we
> need any kind of VCO on Mercury?  The Mercury was have a fixed sample
> clock... but possibly supplied from an external off-board source.
>
> 73 de Phil N8VB

Yes, the MERCURY will have a fixed clock - but it could be supplied
from an external source.

73 de Phil N8VB

 1150812449.0