[hpsdr] AGC
Robert McGwier
rwmcgwier at comcast.net
Wed Jun 21 15:26:53 PDT 2006
Ramakrishnan:
As with all things, it depends.
On the QSD based narrow band receivers, analog AGC is definitely
contraindicated and would definitely not perform as well as the
implementation I did of the Phil Harman dual channel digital agc
proposal (with some testing and advice and code suggestions by Jeff
Anderson, K6JCA). The dynamic range afforded us by the QSD and the
high end audio sound cards help us avoid the analog AGC. This gives us
the ability to anticipate large signals by at least two time constants
in a simple proportional control system for the agc value on both the
slow and fast channel AGC. The latter was my contributing to the
overall design. You may read Phil's original proposal on the hamsdr web
site document section.
On the high speed A/D end, we will definitely benefit from some kind of
gain control on the A/D to aid us in the effective use of the available
dynamic range on Mercury (LTC2208).
Bob
N4HY
Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> May be this is a really stupid question. Pardon my ignorance. Or
> probably this is already addressed, but I am unaware.
>
> Is there any plan to provide DSP-controlled AGC control voltage by
> using a DAC, which can drive a voltage controlled amplifier? If so,
> where will the DAC sit?
>
>
--
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
Laziness is the number one inspiration for ingenuity. Guilty as charged!
1150928813.0
More information about the Hpsdr
mailing list