[hpsdr] What can we do with 2 cards
Alex
harvilchuck at yahoo.com
Sat May 13 05:24:18 PDT 2006
I'm going to bring up my question from earlier.
Why not move the parallel port DSR-1000 control onto JANUS?
Then we have a 2 board solution (plus the backplane). SDR-1000 users can take advantage of other cards like:
GIBRALTAR - to provide the 10MHz reference signal to the SDR-1000
SASQUATCH and the it-who-is-not-named gp I/O board - or computerless SDR-1000 operation
(the gp I/O board can also replace the UCB).
My vote is not to regress the OZY design, but to put the SDR-1000 interface system requirements onto JANUS.
I know one argument put forward was:
Why send the SDR-1000 control commands down the ATLAS bus, deal with them at the OZY.
Well, since we're going to have to handle other i/o commands coming from the host computer and sending them to the gp I/O card, why not let JANUS deal with the i/o for the SDR-1000.
I am advocating to not assume SDR-1000 will always be "state of the art", but nor to ignore that installed user base.
The current card interfacing structure of the SDR-1000 leaves lots to be desired, the HPSDR can provide a good platofrm for expansion.
No, I don't own any SDR-1000s
We need to keep thinking everything through so the HPSDR will meet the requirements from the two interest areas:
(a) SDR-1000 upgrading
(b) HPSDR as a full-up SDR itself (and as a real neat and useful generic benchtop device)
Those are my 2 cents
Alex, N3NP
----- Original Message ----
From: Philip Covington <p.covington at gmail.com>
To: Bill Tracey <bill at ewjt.com>
Cc: HPSDR List <hpsdr at hpsdr.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 7:57:01 AM
Subject: Re: [hpsdr] What can we do with 2 cards
***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
Hi Bill,
If we agree to forgo the Logic Analyzer/Debug Port(s) and also agree
that we will never expect to add external SRAM then I can drop the I2C
IO stuff and provide somewhere around 32 I/O off the OZY. I think you
can do all 3 below then. Then we need to discuss how to
protect/buffer those lines in a way to allow all 32 to be inputs,
outputs, or a combination of both.
I am leaving soon this morning, and on the drive to/from home I will
be thinking more about this.
73 de Phil N8VB
On 5/13/06, Bill Tracey <bill at ewjt.com> wrote:
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> When we started down this path with the Xylo I think one of the
> configuration goals we had was:
>
> 1. Sound Card replacement
> 2. Ultra Low Latency CW input
> 3 .SDR 1000 Parallel Port Control
>
> As we morphed to HPSDR my hope was that this configuration could be done
> with two cards - Audio (Janus) and USB/FPGA (Ozy)
>
> At the moment it looks like we may only be able to do #1 with 2 cards. We
> might be able to do #1 & #2 if we can get low latency CW keying via I2C I/O
> via FX2. We certainly cannot do #3 with just 2 cards. At the moment on
> the Xylo prototypes we've got PTT/DOT and DASH coming thru FPGA pins and
> their state gets integrated into the audio data stream going to the radio,
> giving very low latency.. Doing CW via I2C via FX2 may have sufficiently
> low latency, not sure of this. I'd assume we'd have to read from an FX2
> USB endpoint to get the status of the ports -- anyone know if one can do a
> blocking read waiting for the state of the I2C ports to change from the PC
> -- hate the idea of having to poll the USB port at a hi rate for good CW
> performance. I don't think we can do SDR 1000 parallel port control
> with the I2C expander as it takes 17 (D0-7, C0-3, S3-S7) lines, also not
> clear to me how quickly we can and need to wiggle those lines to program
> the DDS in the SDR 1000 when going via an I2C.
>
> One idea to get back to doing dot/dash directly thru the FPGA is to go
> through the Janus. It looks like there are 4 unused I/O on the Janus
> CPLD. Could we add some protection circuitry on the Janus to 2 of those
> lines and configure the CPLD to put those sigs on the Atlas bus. Maybe
> add 3 more pins to the 0.100 unbalanced audio connector?
>
> I that's not viable, is there space for protection circuitry for 2 lines
> on the Ozy and a 3 pin connector? Could we jumper the configuration of
> the FPGA serial port such that it's either tied to the level converter or
> the external connector?
>
> Just some late night thoughts -- trying to find a way to get a little more
> function into a 2 board setup.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill (kd5tfd)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at hpsdr.org
> Subscription help: http://lists.hpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-hpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://hpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.hpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-hpsdr.org/
>
_______________________________________________
HPSDR Discussion List
To post msg: hpsdr at hpsdr.org
Subscription help: http://lists.hpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-hpsdr.org
HPSDR web page: http://hpsdr.org
Archives: http://lists.hpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-hpsdr.org/
1147523058.0
More information about the Hpsdr
mailing list