[hpsdr] ALEX - Call for comments - Protection devices.

[Henry Vredegoor]

Hi All, Eric,

Unfortunally the result varies with the address(-es) and the address
sequence used in the original message.

E.g., I replied to your message with "Reply-To-All".

I ended up with a "To" field: Eric Blossom; Philip Covington
And a "Cc" field: hpsdr at hpsdr.org

I think that's is not what was agreed in the past, if I understand
Alberto's/Phil's posts correctly:

- The answer should go in general to the list, "hpsdr at hpsdr.org" thus in the
"To" field.
- -If- any "private" copies to the originator or others are required, these
should go in one of the other fields, i.e. In the "Cc" or "Bcc" field.

I hope I've got that right?
Anyhow, I myself will follow this convention, will it be with "one button"
replies or editing the different fields....  :-)


Sorry, for causing this slight off-topic discussion....

73's,
Henry.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: hpsdr-bounces at hpsdr.org 
> [mailto:hpsdr-bounces at hpsdr.org] On Behalf Of Eric Blossom
> Sent: dinsdag 6 maart 2007 21:36
> To: Philip Covington
> Cc: hpsdr at hpsdr.org
> Subject: Re: [hpsdr] ALEX - Call for comments - Protection devices.
> 
> 
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> 
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:39:30AM -0500, Philip Covington wrote:
> > ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> > 
> > >
> > > P.S. When replying to this group, the To: field is set to 
> the sender of the message being replied to, instead of the
> > > group address. Is this done intentionally ? Wouldn't it 
> be more useful to change it the other way ? Usually what one
> > > wants to do is to reply to the group, not to the original poster.
> > 
> > I agree.  I recall there was a vote early on and most favored it the
> > other way around.  I think it is quite annoying myself.
> > 
> > 73 Phil N8VB
> 
> There's a reason that your mail tool has a "Reply" and a
> "Reply-to-all" command/button.  Use "Reply" to reply to only the
> sender.  Use "Reply-to-all" to reply to to both the sender and the
> list.
> 
> This allows the responder to choose between the two actions.
> If it's hardwired to reply-to-list, it's a pain to reply to just the
> sender of a message.
> 
> Eric K7GNU
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at hpsdr.org
> Subscription help: http://lists.hpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-hpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://hpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.hpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-hpsdr.org/
> 


 1173235095.0