[hpsdr] protocol example

[Frank Brickle]

OK. We should be able to figure out a time in there somewhere :-)

73
Frank
AB2KT

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Bob McGwier <rwmcgwier at gmail.com> wrote:

> let's discuss this. I am in Princeton 12/12 until second week of January.
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> ------------------------------
> *From: * Frank Brickle <brickle at pobox.com>
> *Date: *Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:04:32 -0500
> *To: *<rwmcgwier at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *Murray Lang<murray.lang at westnet.com.au>; <
> hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org>; HPSDR<hpsdr at openhpsdr.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [hpsdr] protocol example
>
> It would be lovely if somebody could work up a spec in ASN.1 for VRT :-)
> That would save a whole lot of work for a whole lot of people.
>
> 73
> Frank
> AB2KT
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Bob McGwier <rwmcgwier at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>>
>> In GNURadio, we are implementing Vita 49 and using UDP/IP so we can get
>> routing, switching and more.   This will be available in the USRP2.  So
>> there will verilog implementing it and c++ for the host as well.
>>
>> Flex has already implemented VITA 49 in the 32 rx. CDRX 3200 which they
>> designed for me.   It also uses UDP/IP to transmit the digital IF's.
>>
>> It would lovely if we could all adopt a single standard.
>>
>> We could wind up with lots of interoperable software and if not, at least
>> reusable software pieces.
>>
>> Bob
>> N4HY
>>
>>
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: Murray Lang
>> Sender: hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org
>> To: HPSDR
>> Subject: Re: [hpsdr] protocol example
>> Sent: Dec 3, 2009 11:13 PM
>>
>> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>>
>> Murray Lang wrote:
>> > ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>> >
>> > Phil Harman wrote:
>> >> The original VITA paper is here
>> >>
>> >> < http://www.digitalif.org/images/VRT_SDR_Forum_Oct2008.pdf >
>> >>
>> >> 73's Phil...VK6APH
>> >>
>> >>
>> > Thanks Phil,
>> >
>> > I couldn't see anything in the document about byte order. One would
>> > presume "network" byte order, but we would need to make it explicit
>> > given that most of us use X86.
>> >
>> > 73,
>> > Murray VK6HL
>> Also, despite the claim that VRT "...provides interoperability for many
>> SDR radio applications independent of physical link...", it seems to me
>> to lack the ID field(s) that we would need if it is to be used over IP.
>> We would need to wrap our own frame around it. Not really a problem I
>> don't suppose.
>>
>> Murray VK6HL
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HPSDR Discussion List
>> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
>> Subscription help:
>> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
>> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
>> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HPSDR Discussion List
>> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
>> Subscription help:
>> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
>> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
>> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> The dose makes the poison. -- Paracelsus
>
> Please note new phone numbers:
> mobile: (908) 442-8863
> work: (908) 428-4916
>



-- 
The dose makes the poison. -- Paracelsus

Please note new phone numbers:
mobile: (908) 442-8863
work: (908) 428-4916
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20091205/93d0318c/attachment-0004.htm>