[hpsdr] protocol example

[Bob McGwier]

let's discuss this.  I am in Princeton 12/12 until second week of January.

Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Brickle <brickle at pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:04:32 
To: <rwmcgwier at gmail.com>
Cc: Murray Lang<murray.lang at westnet.com.au>; <hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org>; HPSDR<hpsdr at openhpsdr.org>
Subject: Re: [hpsdr] protocol example

It would be lovely if somebody could work up a spec in ASN.1 for VRT :-)
That would save a whole lot of work for a whole lot of people.

73
Frank
AB2KT

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Bob McGwier <rwmcgwier at gmail.com> wrote:

> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> In GNURadio, we are implementing Vita 49 and using UDP/IP so we can get
> routing, switching and more.   This will be available in the USRP2.  So
> there will verilog implementing it and c++ for the host as well.
>
> Flex has already implemented VITA 49 in the 32 rx. CDRX 3200 which they
> designed for me.   It also uses UDP/IP to transmit the digital IF's.
>
> It would lovely if we could all adopt a single standard.
>
> We could wind up with lots of interoperable software and if not, at least
> reusable software pieces.
>
> Bob
> N4HY
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Murray Lang
> Sender: hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org
> To: HPSDR
> Subject: Re: [hpsdr] protocol example
> Sent: Dec 3, 2009 11:13 PM
>
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> Murray Lang wrote:
> > ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> >
> > Phil Harman wrote:
> >> The original VITA paper is here
> >>
> >> < http://www.digitalif.org/images/VRT_SDR_Forum_Oct2008.pdf >
> >>
> >> 73's Phil...VK6APH
> >>
> >>
> > Thanks Phil,
> >
> > I couldn't see anything in the document about byte order. One would
> > presume "network" byte order, but we would need to make it explicit
> > given that most of us use X86.
> >
> > 73,
> > Murray VK6HL
> Also, despite the claim that VRT "...provides interoperability for many
> SDR radio applications independent of physical link...", it seems to me
> to lack the ID field(s) that we would need if it is to be used over IP.
> We would need to wrap our own frame around it. Not really a problem I
> don't suppose.
>
> Murray VK6HL
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> Subscription help:
> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> Subscription help:
> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
>



-- 
The dose makes the poison. -- Paracelsus

Please note new phone numbers:
mobile: (908) 442-8863
work: (908) 428-4916

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20091205/fd013b9d/attachment-0003.htm>