[hpsdr] Call for Comments and Discussion - OzyII

Henry Vredegoor henry.vredegoor at gmail.com
Wed Jul 22 01:54:03 PDT 2009


Hi Murray,

Since we don't have an OS  in our HPSDR setup these won't work for HPSDR. (
yet?  ;-)  )

Henry.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org 
> [mailto:hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org] On Behalf Of Murray Lang
> Sent: woensdag 22 juli 2009 10:48
> To: hpsdr at lists.openhpsdr.org
> Subject: Re: [hpsdr] Call for Comments and Discussion - OzyII
> 
> 
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> 
> Actually, that's kind of pricey. This one: 
> http://www.eltima.com/products/usb-over-ethernet/ looks like a dufus 
> that sits at the USB device end while the PC end just has a 
> driver. Not 
> sure if I'm interpreting that correctly, or if it will work 
> for us, but 
> it's certainly a lot cheaper than my previous suggestion.
> 
> Murray
> 
> Murray Lang wrote:
> > ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> >
> > Here's one: http://www.bb-europe.com/product_family.asp?FamilyId=528
> >
> > Can't vouch for it or anything.
> >
> > Murray
> >
> > Henry Vredegoor wrote:
> >> Hi Murray,
> >>
> >> I was under the impression that they needed 
> drivers/software in the 
> >> host for
> >> that?
> >> That it was only the PHY hardware (I think) in the adapter?
> >> Maybe the latest don't need this anymore I'll have to check.
> >>
> >> More reading...... ;-)
> >>
> >>
> >> Henry.
> >>
> >>  
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org 
> >>> [mailto:hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org] On Behalf Of 
> Murray Lang
> >>> Sent: woensdag 22 juli 2009 10:14
> >>> To: hpsdr at lists.openhpsdr.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [hpsdr] Call for Comments and Discussion - OzyII
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion 
> List *****
> >>>
> >>> Hi Henry,
> >>>
> >>> You can buy USB to Ethernet converters (with TCP/IP) off 
> the shelf. 
> >>> Will they work for HPSDR? Dunno. If so then you can remote HPSDR 
> >>> right now without a computer.
> >>>
> >>> Murray VK6HL
> >>>
> >>> Henry Vredegoor wrote:
> >>>    
> >>>> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion 
> List *****
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Larry,All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I like to disagree.
> >>>>
> >>>> Having for instance your own remote controlled radio's at       
> >>> remote sites
> >>>    
> >>>> connected via the internet would require a PC at each site.
> >>>> Not a cheap and keep-it-simple solution.
> >>>> Also think of power requirements at remote sites or       
> >>> portable/mobile use that
> >>>    
> >>>> you would like to keep low.
> >>>>
> >>>> Having to (remote) hassle with routing or configuration       
> >>> setups at remote
> >>>    
> >>>> sites without having access to the full functionality that       
> >>> TCP/IP/Linux(or
> >>>    
> >>>> other OS) offers is difficult, not to say a p.i.t.a.
> >>>> I think not to implement the possibility of a full TCP/IP       
> >>> stack if it could
> >>>    
> >>>> be done at a reasonable price would be a missed chance for       
> >>> future (remote)
> >>>    
> >>>> applications of HPSDR.
> >>>> And if you don't want to use TCP/IP, you could simply 
> configure the
> >>>> OzyII/radio to use only Ethernet or just what layers you want.
> >>>> It should maybe also have one or more USB interfaces for       
> >>> legacy reasons or
> >>>    
> >>>> peoples preferences for that matter.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think it won't make that much of a difference in 
> hardware       
> >>> costs once you
> >>>    
> >>>> decided to use a modern capable processor or maybe even       
> >>> better use/integrate
> >>>    
> >>>> a ready made small and cheap microprocessor-board.
> >>>> Like you said there are a bunch of them around, but       
> >>> integration into Ozy and
> >>>    
> >>>> adapt that combo to the specifics of our HPSDR hardware       
> >>> would make it "more
> >>>    
> >>>> than the sum of parts" IMHO.
> >>>>
> >>>> I agree with you and others that OzyII should do the task as a
> >>>> communications processor only, no other frills and thrills.
> >>>> Maybe I confused people on this by mentioning the       
> >>> BeagleBoard as an example
> >>>    
> >>>> for a plug-in microprocessor board for a test setup.
> >>>>
> >>>> 73's,
> >>>>
> >>>> Henry.
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org 
> >>>>> [mailto:hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org] On Behalf Of         
> >>> Larry Gadallah
> >>>    
> >>>>> Sent: woensdag 22 juli 2009 7:53
> >>>>> To: hpsdr at lists.openhpsdr.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [hpsdr] Call for Comments and Discussion - OzyII
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio 
> Discussion List *****
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2009/7/21 Paul Cecil <bikerpaul at suscom-maine.net>:
> >>>>>            
> >>>>>> As I said there are a lot of great ideas being voiced 
> but I       
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>> am afraid that
> >>>>>            
> >>>>>> OZY II will become infected with "bloat", and the 
> attempt       
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>> will be made to
> >>>>>            
> >>>>>> make it a do everything card. If we make it too complex       
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>> then that can delay
> >>>>>            
> >>>>>> its release, and in the end make it too expensive. And 
> with       
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>> that thought we
> >>>>>            
> >>>>>> need to keep this in mind. If we want to see more people       
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>> involved with HPSDR
> >>>>>            
> >>>>>> then we will need to watch our costs. We have all seen 
> the       
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>> "HPSDR boards for
> >>>>>            
> >>>>>> sale" ads that have popped up. And a number have 
> admitted       
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>> the additional
> >>>>>            
> >>>>>> expense to complete the HPSDR to a usable radio was 
> one of       
> >>>>>>           
> >>>>> the factors. Just
> >>>>>            
> >>>>>> something else to think about.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lets keep OZY II simple!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>                 
> >>>>> I also agree with Paul. There is a famous quote 
> somewhere that goes
> >>>>> something like "simplicity is the ultimate         
> >>> sophistication...". In my
> >>>    
> >>>>> humble opinion, a significant detraction from many of 
> the currently
> >>>>> shipping SDRs is the heavy reliance on a stack of         
> >>> (sometimes unstable)
> >>>    
> >>>>> USB hardware and software. If there is a faster, 
> cleaner way to get
> >>>>> data from the ADC/CIC into a user's computer where the 
> interesting
> >>>>> processing is going to happen, I'm all for it. I also         
> >>> suspect that the
> >>>    
> >>>>> more complex the FPGA code and logic becomes, the less         
> >>> likely people
> >>>    
> >>>>> are going to understand it and modify and innovate with it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I concur with all of the comments about being able to 
> "remote" the
> >>>>> receiver "head" using Ethernet, and it is indeed much 
> more         
> >>> flexible to
> >>>    
> >>>>> be able to do a bunch of TCP/IP plumbing to route data         
> >>> here and there,
> >>>    
> >>>>> but I don't think the TCP/IP stack needs to be in the 
> radio itself.
> >>>>> The radio can communicate with the host computer using 
> Ethernet MAC
> >>>>> frames, and the host computer can talk to the rest of 
> the world via
> >>>>> TCP/IP (on a separate interface if need be). Computing         
> >>> appliances of
> >>>    
> >>>>> every kind that speak TCP/IP are now ubiquitous and cheap, and
> >>>>> available in any imaginable format. We don't need to         
> >>> re-invent another
> >>>    
> >>>>> one here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We would do well to remember the time-tested UNIX philosophy for
> >>>>> partitioning work amongst modules: Do only one thing, 
> and         
> >>> do it well.
> >>>    
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> -- 
> >>>>> Larry Gadallah, VE6VQ/W7                          lgadallah AT 
> >>>>> gmail DOT com
> >>>>> PGP Sig: 917E DDB7 C911 9EC1 0CD9  C06B 06C4 835F 0BB8 7336
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> HPSDR Discussion List
> >>>>> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> >>>>> Subscription help: 
> >>>>> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> >>>>> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> >>>>> Archives: 
> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
> >>>>>             
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> HPSDR Discussion List
> >>>> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> >>>> Subscription help:       
> >>> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> >>>    
> >>>> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> >>>> Archives: 
> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
> >>>>
> >>>>         
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> HPSDR Discussion List
> >>> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> >>> Subscription help: 
> >>> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> >>> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> >>> Archives: 
> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
> >>>     
> >>
> >>
> >>   
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > HPSDR Discussion List
> > To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> > Subscription help: 
> > http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> > HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> > Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> Subscription help: 
> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/


 1248252843.0


More information about the Hpsdr mailing list