[hpsdr] Potential New openHPSDR Project

[Phil Harman]

Hi Javier,

Thanks for your comments. I think at this stage the work involved in 
developing our own CPU+DSP board is beyond the resources of the group - 
hence the suggestion of using a suitable existing board.

73's Phil....VK6APH


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ea2dfh at javierromera.com>
To: <hpsdr at lists.openhpsdr.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 4:32 PM
Subject: [hpsdr] Potential New openHPSDR Project


> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm happy with new idea. I've been woking (mainly on my mind) about this
> idea since one year ago.
>
> I began with a OMAPL137 kit and now I'm waiting for a Hawkboard delivery.
>
> In my opinion, we must consider two important points:
>
> * Use of a floating point DSP (A 32 bit at same speed can perform well 
> too)
> * A separate processor for DSP and user/communications/... interface.
>
> A system conceived this way has a completely predictable performance in
> terms of DSP, independent of the use for the rest of components.
>
> Following this way, an OMAPL138 seems a perfect candidate, but another
> approach can consider two separate processors. A powerful cortex A8 as GPU
> and a Analog Devices SHARC for DSP is an even more powerful solution with
> the same approach. Visually, separation of two processors is attractive
> from a experimentation and learning vewpoint.
>
> EA2DFH, Javier
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> Subscription help: 
> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.830 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2995 - Release Date: 07/11/10 
03:59:00


 1278838333.0