[hpsdr] HPSDR Performance Test

[k3it]

112 dB DR3 would be great in a CW contest!

I think the limiting factor is a "contest grade" CW engine, no dit/dah
chopping or hesitation, no keying or signal or side tone delays of more
than 30-40 ms whatsoever.   I can't say that it works this way here.  When
I operate the paddle sometimes it works fine, other times there is too much
lag.

  Has anybody tried ANAN for a serious CW contest operation?

73
Vasiliy


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Helmut, DC6NY <dc6ny at gmx.de> wrote:

> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Adam, VA7OJ/AB4OJ, published the results of his thorough and competent
> performance test of an ANAN100D on his webpage
> http://www.ab4oj.com/sdr/apache/anan100d_notes.pdf
>
> As we all know, that this complete radio is based identically even in
> details on the HPSDR development, this test should be also valid for
> individual setups.
> The HPSDR group can be really proud of this superb design, which would push
> the radio with distance on the top of Rob Sherwood's list, hi. A narrow
> spaced DR3 of 112 dB is a dream.
>
> Thanks to all voluntary hardware- and soft-developers. Let's continue.
>
> 73, Helmut, DC6NY
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> Subscription help:
> http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20130903/593b0cbc/attachment-0004.htm>