[hpsdr] openHPSDR at the forefront of SDR development

[Joe Martin K5SO]

> ... will work fine with either a single powerful computer (SBC) connected to the hardware OR with a high performance computer connected to the hardware as we have traditionally done.

I meant: single board computer (SBC).

73, Joe K5SO

On Aug 26, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Joe Martin K5SO wrote:

> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> 
> Hi John, 
> 
> I completely agree with your analysis and have in fact privately expressed to several people my concern regarding use of a (marginally powerful) single board computer in the mix.  But keep in mind that the new protocol that Phil is contemplating will work fine with either a single powerful computer (SBC) connected to the hardware OR with a high performance computer connected to the hardware as we have traditionally done.  
> 
> Therefore the SBC development activity underway doesn’t limit things at all for those of us who would prefer to use a single high performance computer instead.  Users of a single high performance computer can still exploit the new protocol and realize the same flexibility and performance benefits that Phil mentioned that are associated with the new proposed ethernet protocol.   
> 
> The Jetson board SBC approach is simply an activity that is running in parallel with the original architecture scheme.  Whether you wish to use an SBC configuration or not is entirely optional and open to your personal preference.  I’ve come to realize that we’re not losing anything at all by having some people working on SBC configurations in order to have low-performance hand held devices able to interface the hardware (if that happens to be your personal interest).  
> 
> 73, Joe K5SO
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20140826/a0598829/attachment-0003.htm>