[hpsdr] Whitch CPU will be better for HPSDR?

[Michael Cozzi]

     Some QSOs are better than others.

     If it's a macro- I watch a movie. If it's a person willing to 
converse... The movie goes off.

     Michael KD8TUT

On 10/31/2015 6:50 PM, Tom Tierney wrote:
> OK I will confess to filling up the coffee cup during a JT65/JT9 QSO.
>
> But watching a movie !!
>
> T
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>       Bert,
>
>       I'd go for more cores (preference). More cores = more threads and
> that can be helpful while running multiple apps.
>
>       I've got an 8 core AMD 9590 which rarely goes over 20% utilization
> with two bands, HRD, digital master, and VAC running- while watching a
> movie... .
>
>       Either of those chips would perform just fine.
>
>       Michael KD8TUT
>
> On 10/31/2015 2:36 PM, H.A.Meijer wrote:
>> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi to you all,
>>
>> I'm looking for components to build a new sdr pc for use with my
>> HPSDR hardware.
>>
>> Now I'm asking myself, what would make a better " thick pipe SDR" CPU.
>>
>> Higher CPU clock freq. and less cores,
>> for example a, Intel Core i7-6700K, 4x 4.00GHz. ?
>> or
>> more cores and lower CPU clock freq.?
>> for example a : Intel Core i7-5820K, 6x 3.30GHz.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this......
>>
>>
>> 73's  Bert PA2XHF.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hpsdr [mailto:hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org] On Behalf Of Michael Cozzi
> Sent: 31 October 2015 21:23
> To: hpsdr at lists.openhpsdr.org
> Subject: Re: [hpsdr] Whitch CPU will be better for HPSDR?
>
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>