[hpsdr] Tech discussion on list (new subject line)

[Scott Traurig]

Oops, just found the link to the article at the bottom of your rejection
letter page! I will read it!

73!

Scott

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Scott Traurig <scott.traurig at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Doug,
>
> It's a pretty standard rejection letter that many, many people receive
> everyday from nearly any publication on the planet.
>
> The standard formula for a rejection letter in the publishing industry is:
>
> Say thanks.
> Deliver the news.
> Give the main reason.
> Offer hope.
>
> And it pretty much follows that formula. It's not rude at all. Rejection
> is always tough!
>
> 73,
>
> Scott/w-u-2-o
>
> P.S. You could publish on this list.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Doug Ronald <doug at dougronald.com> wrote:
>
>> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>>
>> I have a private message from someone asking how I measured that 53 dBm
>> IMD3 mentioned in my post on 7/10/17, so in the spirit of those requests to
>> continue technical discussion here, I'll answer that question even though
>> it could be considered noise relative to openhpsdr.
>>
>> Answer: I made my own tester. I submitted an article on it to QEX, where
>> it was rejected in a rather rude letter. Here is a link, and the submitted
>> manuscript link is at the bottom of the page...
>> http://w6dsr.com/IMDtester/index.html
>>
>> -Doug, W6DSR
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20170711/2cc62ce1/attachment.htm>