[hpsdr] Tech discussion on list (new subject line)

[Scott Traurig]

Doug,

It's a pretty standard rejection letter that many, many people receive
everyday from nearly any publication on the planet.

The standard formula for a rejection letter in the publishing industry is:

Say thanks.
Deliver the news.
Give the main reason.
Offer hope.

And it pretty much follows that formula. It's not rude at all. Rejection is
always tough!

73,

Scott/w-u-2-o

P.S. You could publish on this list.



On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Doug Ronald <doug at dougronald.com> wrote:

> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> I have a private message from someone asking how I measured that 53 dBm
> IMD3 mentioned in my post on 7/10/17, so in the spirit of those requests to
> continue technical discussion here, I'll answer that question even though
> it could be considered noise relative to openhpsdr.
>
> Answer: I made my own tester. I submitted an article on it to QEX, where
> it was rejected in a rather rude letter. Here is a link, and the submitted
> manuscript link is at the bottom of the page...
> http://w6dsr.com/IMDtester/index.html
>
> -Doug, W6DSR
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20170711/9ff7d542/attachment.htm>