[hpsdr] Tech discussion on list (new subject line)

[George Byrkit]

Dear Doug,
It is an interesting article.  I do NOT however, find Kai's rejection letter to be rather rude, as you put it.  It is more likely that it isn't really in the style that they want to publish.

73,
George K9TRV

-----Original Message-----
From: Hpsdr [mailto:hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org] On Behalf Of Doug Ronald
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 3:43 PM
To: hpsdr at lists.openhpsdr.org
Subject: Re: [hpsdr] Tech discussion on list (new subject line)
Importance: Low

***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****

I have a private message from someone asking how I measured that 53 dBm IMD3 mentioned in my post on 7/10/17, so in the spirit of those requests to continue technical discussion here, I'll answer that question even though it could be considered noise relative to openhpsdr.

Answer: I made my own tester. I submitted an article on it to QEX, where it was rejected in a rather rude letter. Here is a link, and the submitted manuscript link is at the bottom of the page...
http://w6dsr.com/IMDtester/index.html

-Doug, W6DSR

-----Original Message-----
From: Hpsdr [mailto:hpsdr-bounces at lists.openhpsdr.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:17 PM
To: hpsdr at lists.openhpsdr.org
Subject: Re: [hpsdr] Tech discussion on list (new subject line)

***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****

</LURK>

I hope that technical discussions will remain on list. The technical discussions are the main reason I read this list. If it were mainly people who "don't understand" asking questions and the resulting replies (also a legitimate posting) mixed with those like me who only think we understand, it might not even be worth following.

The technical discussions of where HPSDR might go, or not, and why are the main reason this list exists IMHO. Hopefully those of you with the time and talent to pursue HPSDR development will continue to post here for the benefit of those of us who lack either time or talent (or both!) to meaningfully contribute.

No need to throttle back, have the discussions. Just have them here and not somewhere else.

73 de Glenn WB6W

<LURK>


On 7/11/2017 10:27 AM, James Malone wrote:
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>
> Please keep the discussion on the list!
>
> Tnx
>
> Wa3lbi
>
>

--
"i" before "e" except after "c",  or when sounded as "a" as in neighbor and weigh.

However this rule seems “counterfeit”. 
It “forfeits” generality, lacking “height” and some “conscience”. 
Maybe it’s not “either” or “neither”

Maybe the idea is “foreign”, possibly a “sovereign heir”? 
Or just a “leisure” activity?

Is it nutritious as "protein"?
Unless it's just plain old "weird"

…like “efficient glacier science”?
Is this example “sufficient”?


_______________________________________________
HPSDR Discussion List
To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
Subscription help: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/

_______________________________________________
HPSDR Discussion List
To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
Subscription help: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/