[hpsdr] Protocol 2 Status?

[Sebastien F4GRX]

Hello

being an open source guy I would have a huge problem if openhpsdr's open
source firware was switched to closed source, whatever my "level" of use
of the product...

Open source is what allows continued development of these project.

If open source tools cannot compile the protocol successfully, then I
think that it's time to invent a new protocol that does :)

Just saying...

73's, de Sebastien

On 27/01/2018 02:40, john clark wrote:
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you Scott/w-u-2-o for that information.
> 
> Being a utility type user I have no problems with the lowest level
> components being proprietary. I'm sure that my 100D has many now.  I do
> not plan on working at that level. I am hopeful that Apache Labs, Phil
> and others doing the FPGA work can press Quartus to provide the
> necessary software without costs, and the same for those qualified
> experimenters that may feel the need. [ Are there others? ] I have heard
> Phil talk about the gratis support from some engineering companies that
> have helped him progress. I also hope that P2 being a much limited
> feature protocol can quickly move to be "Done" and static. It would be a
> big disappointment to see the development abandoned. An expensive ( in
> time ) learning experience. What is being done with the new products on
> the bench? Hermes II,DFC ? Surely they will use P2? 
> Do I need to send a letter to Apache Labs?
> 
> 73
> John
>  TI4/N0URE
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HPSDR Discussion List
> To post msg: hpsdr at openhpsdr.org
> Subscription help: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/listinfo.cgi/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org
> HPSDR web page: http://openhpsdr.org
> Archives: http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/
>