[hpsdr] Dual Synthesiser
Grant Hodgson
grant at ghengineering.co.uk
Fri Nov 10 02:14:56 PST 2006
Brian
>> I need 640 MHz and 100 MHz for my 10 GHz rig.
That's a very unusual combination. The easiest way to generate an LO
for 10GHz with a PLL is to use a 2.4GHz VCO and multiply by 4; good
quality multipliers are available such as the HMC443LP4 which require
very little filtering.
I have been looking at
>> various ways to do this including using two of the REFLOCK II boards
and various demo boards.
These are not the hardest of frequencies to
>> generate but as the 640 MHz has to be multiplied by 16 so its phase
noise has to be quite good. I am tending towards building a synthesizer
using two standard T paged VCOs and an LMX 2485 loaded by a CPLD.
With a Frac-N PLL IC such as the LMX2485 (which incidentally is an
absolutely superb IC) you don't need a reflock - you can generate almost
any frequency you want in steps of a few Hz with a standard 10MHz
reference. Fractional and sub-fractional spurs within the loop
bandwidth are at quite low levels; I have posted a number of plots on
the uWSDR Yahoo group files section for those that like that sort of
thing. I'll put them on my website if anybody wants them without having
to join the uWSDR group.
>> It seams that this could be a useful board for many other
applications including the LO generation for SDRs. In the case of low IF
radios the lower frequency synthesizer could be made to tune an octave
at some VHF frequency and divided by the CPLD to give the necessary
coverage. The higher frequency synthesizer could be used for down
converting higher bands to the SDR frequencies.
There are issues with dividing down a VHF/UHF LO, and the phase noise
may not be as good as you may expect. The AD9852 DDS as used on
SDR-1000 takes some beating for close-in phase noise at HF, and whilst
OK for a 'general-purpose' radio, a simple divided-down PLL can't beat
the close-in phase noise of a good DDS - something more sophisticated
such as an offset-PLL would be needed, as used on the Orion.
>> Specifically for my initial application I am looking at using a
Sirenza CRO 190-1280T vco, with a 1240 to 1320 MHz tuning range, divided
by 2 for the 640 MHz.
That's a good VCO. But I'm not quite sure why it would need to be
divided and then multiplied - direct multiplication would give less
spurs. But even better VCOs are available for the 2.5-2.6GHz band from
a number of manufacturers.
More details of the Microwave SDR project can be found at
uwsdr.berlios.de and the Yahoo group is at
groups.yahoo.com/group/uwsdr
Hope the non-microwavers on list don't mind the bandwidth.
regards
Grant G8UBN
1163153696.0
More information about the Hpsdr
mailing list