[hpsdr] Sasquatch II

[Sid Boyce]

Jonathan Naylor wrote:
> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> 
>> On the other hand, I like embedded DSP, and I hate to see
>> the HPSDR project become PC-dependent.
> 
> Why not?
> 
> By going for an embedded DSP you'd just be reproducing existing Japanese radios but with better hardware. Isn'y it about time that we shed the past and move onto more advanced user interfaces? The developments of DttSP and the VR kernel promise to revolutionise amateur radio. This sort of thing can only be done with a PC which allows for a rich user interface. HPSDR is not about looking backwards, neither should the DSP side.
> 
>> Comments?
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Lyle KK7P
> 
> Jonathan  G4KLX
> 
> 

Perhaps he meant to say "OS platform dependent" which effectively serves
to lock out a substantial body of users, e.g:- Not a big problem as I
have sdr-shell running, but I for one have not found a way of running
PowerSDR with mono or cxoffice, it says it requires .NET.
73...
Sid.
-- 
Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot
Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support
Specialist, Cricket Coach
Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks


 1229098186.0