[hpsdr] Potential New openHPSDR Project

[Thierbach, Ed]

Sounds like the first pass, then, would be to use USB, as we would with an outboard PC, and see what we can do.  Next step, or maybe in parallel, is for the hardware wizards to work out ways of getting the boards talk directly with Atlas.

I've been eyeing the BeagleBoard for a while, so I'll get one of those.  Not sure if I'll wait for the xM, or get a C4 now and save my pennies for an xM later.  The BeagleBrick project (http://beagleboard.org/project/BeagleBrick/) has probably made some good progress; that might be a nice place to start.

-Ed-

On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Dave Larsen wrote:

> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
> 
> Henry --
> 
> The ghpsdr3 code is not that large and should fit easily and load is
> quite reasonable.  
> 
> It should be time for someone to get a development board and try to get
> it to work.
> 
> Doing the testing we would learn a lot about the capabilities.  There
> should be a few people with BeagleBoards,  It would also be nice to
> compare with a Hawkboard.
> 
> It sound like a nice new project for a someone.
> 
> Dave, KV0S
> 
> On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 00:57 +0200, Henry Vredegoor wrote:
>> ***** High Performance Software Defined Radio Discussion List *****
>> 
>> Hi All, Gordon,
>> 
>> That brings us to an important question:
>> 
>> What fuctionallity should this processor board have and what is
>> possible wrt. (DSP-) processing power with a BeagleBoard, Hawkboard or
>> any other similar board?
>> 
>> I myself am thinking of a kind of HPSDR server for eg. ghpsdr,
>> relieving the PC from some load (multi-rx!)  in combination with
>> network- and communications tasks.
>> 
>> 73's,
>> 
>> Henry.


 1278735501.0