[hpsdr] about latency growth with HPSDR
Riho B., ES7AAZ
es7aaz at gmail.com
Sat Oct 1 03:24:18 PDT 2011
Thanks Phil,
As I see I need to upgrade my hardware. I'm still Ozy user since most
of the time I'm running my HPSDR @ 48 kHz, there's no need for
higher sampling rates for me.
Thanks again !
73's
Riho, ES7AAZ.
1.10.2011 10:14, Phil Harman kirjutas:
> Hi Riho,
> You may care to do some tests on you system using KISS Konsole since I
> suspect you are dropping packets between the PC and HPSDR hardware.
> If you are only losing the odd packet then you are not going to hear them.
> The Metis Ethernet code has a packet number included in each data
> frame both to and from the PC. KK will indicate if a packet is lost
> and what the expected and received packet numbers are. Similarly
> Metis will light a LED if it misses a packet.
> Using KK with Metis at 192ksps I have never seen a missed packet in
> either direction - in fact I had to deliberately send incorrect packet
> numbers to check the code was working!
> I'm also currently doing some work that involves time stamping the
> data from Mercury via Metis - again no dropped packets.
> The PC has absolutely no idea what the sample rate is of the data it
> is being sent. It's not acceptable that an SDR can't be used for DRM,
> SSTV etc - this needs to be investigated and corrected.
> 73 Phil...VK6APH
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20111001/084d4c46/attachment-0004.htm>
More information about the Hpsdr
mailing list