[hpsdr] Timer resolution from 15.6 to 1 ms

[Warren C. Pratt]

Hi Bert,

Thanks for the feedback.  On SNB, yes, the low-end loss is by design.  
Including the low-end response requires more compute cycles and so I've 
left that out for now.  I plan to reconsider that some day.

73,
Warren  NR0V


On 4/23/2016 1:24 PM, H.A.Meijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a little heads-up to the HPSDR developers, the latest openHPSDR 
> v.3.3.7. is working very well and stable.
>
> The audio distortions, when changing filter band width and pan-adapter 
> zooming, are now gone.
>
> (due to the 1 ms timer resolution done by the open HPSDR program it 
> self.) Thanks!.
>
> The NR2 is best I've ever seen (heard) on any ham-grade transceiver.
>
> When using SNB I lose all the audio low-end to almost 300Hz, that's by 
> design?
>
>
> Thanks,
> 73,
> Bert  PA2XHF / PE1MTS.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20160423/6ac7fafa/attachment.htm>