[hpsdr] ANAN-100D 6 meter reception
Bill Diaz
william.diaz at comcast.net
Wed Sep 4 11:39:43 PDT 2013
I enjoyed reading Adam Farson VA7OJ/AB4OJ Apache Labs Test report (
http://www.ab4oj.com/sdr/apache/anan100d_notes.pdf ). Adam used
PowerSdr mRx FFT 3.1.5 but did not report what firmware he used in the
tests.
Adam reported a 50.1MHZ MDS of -121dBm and a 28.1MHZ MDS of -131dBm. The
10 db difference seemed similar to what I observe when I activate the
Alex 6MLNA/HPF in my Apache Labs ANAN-100D.
I decided to use my meager resources to see if my ANAN-100D 6 meter
performance was similar to the 6 meter results in Adams report. While I
do not have the means to measure MDS, I could observe relative noise
floor levels on the different bands. Note that I have not calibrated
receive levels of my ANAN-100, so the absolute values will not be
correct, but the relative noise floor measurements provide interesting
information about 6 meter performance..
ANAN-100D Angelia 1.9 firmware. PowerSDR 3.1.5. Relative noise floor
measurements
Reset database, restart PowerSDR. Power up radio.
Terminate ANT1, ANT2, ANT3, and RX2 with 50 ohm shielded terminations.
Select RX1, RX2 Meter Sig Avg
Select CW, 500hz filter for all bands on RX1 and RX2.
Setup/Ant Filters/HPF/LPF tab, Enabled checkmark for ByPass/55Mhz HPF.
All other settings at default.
Alex Manual/Bypass enabled Alex Auto/Bypass disabled
Freq RX1 RX2 RX1 RX2
1900 -137.7dbm -137.9 -138.2 -137.9
3600 -138.5dbm -137.9 -138.5 -137.9
5346.5 -137.5dbm -138.8 -137.7 -138.8
7100 -137.7dbm -139.5 -137.5 -139.3
10120 -137.5dbm -139.1 -137.6 -139.0
14100 -137.3dbm -137.6 -137.0 -137.7
18100 -137.5dbm -137.8 -137.3 -137.9
21100 -137.2dbm -137.6 -137.5 -137.7
24900 -137.7dbm -136.9 -137.0 -136.9
28100 -137.5dbm -136.8 -137.4 -136.9
50100 -135.4dbm -136.6 -127.8 -136.9 RX1 noise
floor increased 7.6db when 6M LNA/HPF activated.
It appears from the above my ANAN-100D 6m relative noise floor results
co-relate somewhat to the differences between the 10m and 6m MDS values
shown in Adam's report. Based on the above we can assume Adam used the
default PowerSDR settings and it is likely the 6M LNA/HPF was active
during his 6M measurements.
It appears there is some issue with the 6M LNA/HPF activation in my
ANAN-100D. It would be interesting to see if others observe a similar
increase in the 6 meter noise floor when the 6M LNA/HPF is activated.
Bill KC9XG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openhpsdr.org/pipermail/hpsdr-openhpsdr.org/attachments/20130904/11ac007d/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the Hpsdr
mailing list